Prediction of Daniel Elahi Galan [115th] vs Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida [325th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W L L W W
Form
W L W W W L W L W LHead-To-Head: Galan 3 - 0 Almeida
They have played 6 sets in total, with Galan winning 6 and Almeida winning 0. The last match between Galan and Almeida was at the Concepcion Challenger, 26-03-2025, Second, Clay with Daniel Elahi Galan getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniel Elahi Galan | 3 |
| Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida | 0 |
| Galan | Stats | Almeida |
|---|---|---|
| 69% (20-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (10-8) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 115 | Ranking | 325 |
| 56 | Highest Rank | 190 |
| 28 | Age | 24 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 10 | Titles | 5 |
| 55% (407-327) | Career Total W/L | 59% (214-149) |
| $1,525,360 | Career Prize Money | $57,890 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 3 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 7-6(4) |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve %
57%
(
73 of
127)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
7
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
17%
(
3 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
57 of
127)
114
Total Points Won
109
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 38 | Games Won | 25 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:5:49 | Average Match Time | 2:5:49 |
| 65% (146/223) | 1st Serve % | 64% (168/263) |
| 68% (99/146) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (95/168) |
| 52% (40/77) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (48/95) |
| 30% (11/37) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 24% (5/21) |
| 46% (120/263) | Return Points Win % | 38% (84/223) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daniel Elahi Galan vs Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Galan 3 - 0 Almeida
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Galan has won 44.66% of points on their second serve, while Almeida has won 42.82%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Galan, in recent form, has won 46.21% of their opponent's second serve points, while Almeida has won 45.29%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.31% and 30.31% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Galan has saved 55.99% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Almeida has saved 45.42% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Galan has won 57.69% of matches played (W/L 45/ 33), with Almeida winning 58.46% (W/L 38/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Galan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 287/ 201), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 15% (W/L 3/ 17). Almeida has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 192/ 128), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Galan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.75% of matches (W/L 32/ 19), where as Almeida has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.1% of matches (W/L 27/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Galan winning 3 times and Almeida being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Galan winning 6 and Almeida winning 0. The last match between Galan and Almeida was at the Concepcion Challenger, 26-03-2025, Second, Clay with Daniel Elahi Galan getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:5:49.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Galan and Almeida have played a deciding set 0 times, with Galan winning 0 times and Almeida 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Galan winning 2, and Almeida 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Galan has played against opponents with an average rank of 203.15 while Almeida has played against players with an average rank of 319.18.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Galan has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Almeida has won 32% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Galan has converted 28.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Almeida has converted 35.84% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Daniel Elahi Galan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Jacob Fearnley
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Nikoloz Basilashvili
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
21 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Remy Bertola
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
37%
(
17 of
46)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Pedro Boscardin Dias
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
67
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Benjamin Torrealba
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Thiago Moura Monteiro
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
14
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Varillas
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
57%
(
57 of
100)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Yuki Mochizuki
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Alvaro Guillen Meza
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Matias Soto
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Facundo Mena
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve %
57%
(
73 of
127)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
7
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
17%
(
3 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
57 of
127)
114
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Renzo Olivo
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Galan vs Almeida?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Galan Vs Almeida is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (407/327) | Win/Loss | 59% (214/149) |
| 54% (950/801) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (492/339) |
| 52% (8707/8154) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4173/3572) |
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 3177 | Aces Total | 637 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1183 | Total Double Faults | 635 |
| 1:30:57 | Average Match Time | 1:39:19 |
| 420.03 | Average Opponent Rank | 386.44 |
| 62% (29622/47713) | 1st Serve % | 66% (14396/21771) |
| 70% (20644/29622) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (9532/14396) |
| 51% (9187/18089) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (3800/7375) |
| 42% (1795/4322) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1036/2328) |
| 39% (18229/47065) | Return Points Win % | 42% (9167/21931) |
| 56% (389/699) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (211/353) |
| 50% (15/30) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 17% (1/6) |
| 56% (141/253) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (55/109) |
| 50% (122/243) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (42/103) |
| 84% (415/348) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (230/190) |
| 16% (415/67) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (230/38) |
| 18% (319/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (133/24) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Daniel Elahi Galan
View full predicted draw for Galan in Barcelona
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
